Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  FireStryker Living History Forum   » History   » Arms & Armour   » Aventail help ?

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Aventail help ?
Otto von Teich
Member
Member # 129

posted 01-12-2002 09:58 AM     Profile for Otto von Teich   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I have a basenet coming and need to attach the mail. I've read that on the originals the mail was put over the vervelles with a metal plate (often leather strap?) over this,then wire or cord lace through the vervelles holding it all together.I've seen examples (most likely restored?)with the mail sewn to the leather strap, and sometimes the top edge of the mail is wover directly into the strap.Seems like putting a link of mail over each vervelle with strap laying over that would be the easiest solution, but is it correct? Thanks for any input,James "otto" D.
Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged
chef de chambre
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 4

posted 01-12-2002 11:28 AM     Profile for chef de chambre   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hi Otto,

Keeping in mind the 14th century stuff isn't my specialty - sewing the mail to the leather strip gives it a defined edge and keeps it hanging even. There are many more links on an edge than there are verveles on your bascinet, and the mail would most likely drape funny otherwise.

That said, something to keep in mind is that some current research argues that a padded aventail would have been worn under the mail one. Evidence for this theory is the rigid shape of the aventail on many barasses, and more importantly on three dimensional statuary, and one key clue coming from the tomb of Philip the Bold, who is not wearing his bascinet, but it is set to the side, allowing the viewer to look 'into' the aventail, where a padded lining can clearly be seen.

[ 01-12-2002: Message edited by: chef de chambre ]

--------------------

Bob R.


Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged
Otto von Teich
Member
Member # 129

posted 01-12-2002 11:56 AM     Profile for Otto von Teich   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Good thoughts Bob, I hadnt thought about the aventail hanging funny. Padded liner makes sense to me. Most armour from the period doesnt really have much collarbone defence,a padded aventail would help a great deal.Thanks, Otto
Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged
hauptmann
unregistered

posted 01-12-2002 01:46 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
What we've done on occasion is make the liner extend out of the bottom of the helmet and flare wide all the way to the bottom of the aventail. This works well and is more elegant than having a separate padded piece for the aventail liner AND the helmet liner.

There are statues/carvings/effigies that show points along the bottom edge of the aventail, perhaps holding the mail in place over the padded liner, perhaps pointing the whole arrangement to the lentner or jupon to keep it from shifting or lifting up during movement. Either of these possibilities seems plausible and perhaps both were used.

In any case, it seems unlikely that aventails had no lining under them, as they damage the torso garments underneath from abrasion and offer little protection on their own; having much more protective value with even a small amount of padding underneath.

BTW,
The most common method of hanging the mail seems to be stitching the upper edge of the mail to a specially patterned leather strip (not just a strap), then putting holes in the leather to go over the vervailles, then running a cord (probably linen or hemp) through the vervailles, knotting it outside the end vervailles. I do it this way when installing aventailles and it works very well and looks quite historically correct.

[ 01-12-2002: Message edited by: hauptmann ]


IP: Logged
Otto von Teich
Member
Member # 129

posted 01-12-2002 04:33 PM     Profile for Otto von Teich   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Thanks Jeff! Sounds like a good plan, I'll try it. By the way,do you know how many vervelles the original helmet,yours is based on had? Thanks, James "otto" Deichmiller
Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged
Seigneur de Leon
Member
Member # 65

posted 01-13-2002 12:57 AM     Profile for Seigneur de Leon   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I agree with what Jeff H. said, and that is how I am attaching my camail, but the amount of vervelles will be the amount of pre-drilled holes that aready are in my bascinet as made by MacKenzie-Smith - not because the number is correct, but because the path has already been laid. M-S uses those bogus "staples" or bent wires to attach the camail.

How are you planning to cinch-up the chin/face?

--------------------

VERITAS IN INTIMO
VIRES IN LACERTU
SIMPLICITAS IN EXPRESSO


Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Otto von Teich
Member
Member # 129

posted 01-13-2002 10:47 AM     Profile for Otto von Teich   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The reason I asked Jeffery about the number of vervelles was because the helm was made in his shop.I'll have to put my own holes in it. It was based on #13 at the Churburg Armoury.One of the "in stock" helmets he listed right before xmas. As far as cinching the face,hmmmmm, hadnt really thought about that.Would a leather thong,run through the uppermost links around the face do?....Otto
Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged
Seigneur de Leon
Member
Member # 65

posted 01-13-2002 06:57 PM     Profile for Seigneur de Leon   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
That's the way mine works, and I never used a chin strap (other than for armour inspection) for SCA combat either. When you pull it tight, then stuff it into the camail, the direction of the links tend to hold it tight enough that you don't need to tie it.
I'm thinking strongly about redoing the padding the way Jeff H. said on the camail. Not only would it protect, it would hold the shape better, and most importantly, it would quit pulling my beard. I have a bag of mane & tail hair, wool and tow, but I haven't decided which would be better. Any suggestions?

--------------------

VERITAS IN INTIMO
VIRES IN LACERTU
SIMPLICITAS IN EXPRESSO


Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
chef de chambre
Admin & Advocatus Diaboli
Member # 4

posted 01-13-2002 10:58 PM     Profile for chef de chambre   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hi Jeff,

I'd be for the wool or tow. The only reason I mention this is that hair seems to work its way between the weave of the fabric, so you end up losing it. I just stuffed a helmet liner with flax tow, and it seems to work very well.

--------------------

Bob R.


Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | Wolfe Argent Living History

Copyright © 2000-2009 Wolfe Argent Living History. All Rights reserved under International Copyright Conventions. No part of this website may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission of the content providers. Individual rights remain with the owners of the posted material.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.01